Close Menu
  • Home
  • Europe
  • United Kingdom
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • Travel
Trending

Lioness to face Dutch girlfriend in clash which could see England out of Euros

July 8, 2025

Migration Commissioner expelled from Libya as ‘persona non grata’

July 8, 2025

UK Post Office scandal may have led to at least 13 suicides, inquiry finds

July 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
Se Connecter
July 8, 2025
Euro News Source
Live Markets Newsletter
  • Home
  • Europe
  • United Kingdom
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Culture
  • Health
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • Travel
Euro News Source
Home»Europe
Europe

EU Funding Reconsideration Creates Financial Strain for Environmental Organizations

News RoomBy News RoomDecember 6, 2024
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Copy Link Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram

The European Commission is currently embroiled in a debate over the funding of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) engaged in environmental advocacy work, with leaked documents revealing potential changes to funding rules. This reconsideration comes amidst concerns from NGOs that they require public financial support to effectively counterbalance the influence of powerful industry lobbies. The crux of the issue revolves around the European Union’s LIFE Programme, a €5.4 billion initiative spanning 2021-2027, designed to support environmental and climate action. While seemingly substantial, this budget represents a mere 0.3% of total EU spending when post-COVID recovery funds are factored in. Furthermore, the portion allocated to NGOs for operational costs is a relatively meager €15 million annually. This limited funding has raised alarms among NGOs who argue it restricts their capacity to participate effectively in policy discussions and advocate for environmental protection.

A coalition of approximately 30 environmental NGOs, including prominent organizations like Friends of the Earth Europe and Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, penned a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen expressing their concerns. They argue that a robust democracy necessitates adequate resources for citizens’ voices to be heard by decision-makers. They highlight the inherent power imbalance in lobbying efforts, stating that resource-rich entities like multinational corporations and foreign governments possess significantly greater financial muscle than citizen groups and NGOs, hindering the latter’s ability to engage effectively in policy dialogues at the European level. This disparity in resources, they contend, threatens to marginalize citizen voices and undermine democratic processes.

Adding to the NGOs’ anxieties is the rising political backlash against environmental policies. Von der Leyen’s own political affiliation, the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP), has successfully diluted several key components of the “Green Deal” legislation, often with support from right-leaning parties. This political climate has created an atmosphere of uncertainty for environmental NGOs, raising fears that their funding might be further curtailed. Members of the European Parliament’s budgetary control committee have also voiced concerns, suggesting that funding NGOs could be perceived as the Commission indirectly lobbying Parliament through third parties, thereby raising ethical and reputational questions.

In response to these concerns, Budget Commissioner Piotr Serafin acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations and stated that the Commission has issued internal guidance clarifying which activities should not be funded. He refuted the accusation of indirect lobbying, emphasizing that organizations receiving EU funding remain solely responsible for their views, which may not align with the Commission’s position. Serafin also mentioned that the Commission is awaiting a special report from the European Court of Auditors on EU funding to NGOs, expected in the first half of 2025. This report is anticipated to shed further light on the financial practices and potential risks associated with NGO funding.

While the LIFE Programme’s legislation explicitly states that the fund should support the development, implementation, and enforcement of relevant EU environmental legislation and policy, Commissioner Serafin has indicated that certain activities directed at EU institutions, even if legally permissible, could pose reputational risks. This nuanced stance adds complexity to the debate and potentially restricts the scope of activities that NGOs can undertake with EU funding. The disparity in financial resources between NGOs and industry lobbies remains a significant concern. The maximum operating grant awarded to any single organization under the LIFE Programme in 2023 was €700,000, which was granted to several prominent environmental groups.

In contrast, industry lobby groups such as the European Chemical Industry Council and Business Europe boast significantly larger annual budgets, exceeding €10 million and €6 million respectively. This substantial difference in financial capacity highlights the challenge faced by NGOs in competing for influence and advocating for environmental protection against well-funded industry interests. For many NGOs active in Brussels, funding from the LIFE Programme represents a substantial portion of their annual budget, often exceeding half their total income. This reliance on EU funding underscores the vulnerability of these organizations to potential funding cuts and the importance of maintaining adequate public support for their operations. The ongoing debate over NGO funding within the European Commission highlights the complex interplay between environmental policy, lobbying efforts, and public perception. The outcome of this debate will significantly impact the ability of NGOs to act as a countervailing force against powerful industry interests and advocate effectively for environmental protection within the EU.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram WhatsApp Email

Keep Reading

Migration Commissioner expelled from Libya as ‘persona non grata’

Europe July 8, 2025

Syria issues appeal to EU for help battling massive wildfires along northwestern coast

Europe July 8, 2025

Patriots break cordon sanitaire to seize climate file in European Parliament 

Europe July 8, 2025

European Commission puts prepped Mercosur deal on ice

Europe July 8, 2025

Marine Le Pen turns to European law in bid to overturn ineligibility ruling

Europe July 8, 2025

Portugal records 284 excess deaths during heatwave as wildfires rage across Europe

Europe July 8, 2025

15 EU countries allowed to violate deficit limit for defence spending

Europe July 8, 2025

France’s Macron visits UK with migration, Ukraine topping the agenda

Europe July 8, 2025

EU Parliament confidence vote: Where do parties stand on von der Leyen?

Europe July 8, 2025

Editors Picks

Migration Commissioner expelled from Libya as ‘persona non grata’

July 8, 2025

UK Post Office scandal may have led to at least 13 suicides, inquiry finds

July 8, 2025

Was the BBC right to fire Gregg Wallace over MasterChef scandal? Vote in our poll

July 8, 2025

Syria issues appeal to EU for help battling massive wildfires along northwestern coast

July 8, 2025

Latest News

ICC issues arrest warrants for Taliban leaders over women’s rights violations

July 8, 2025

Little Lioness army roar for England 800-miles away as team takes on the Dutch

July 8, 2025

Patriots break cordon sanitaire to seize climate file in European Parliament 

July 8, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest Europe and World news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest Instagram
2025 © Euro News Source. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?