The claim that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has acknowledged that mRNA vaccines have not been formally approved and that millions have therefore been vaccinated without clear guidelines is fake and spreading unverified information in circulating online content. A Swiss website, Uncut-News, has highlighted this false claim. In their article[1], the website reported that the EMA published a paper in January stating that there is no guideline which reflects the quality requirements for regulators and industry on mRNA containing vaccines. This paper, which focuses on veterinary vaccines rather than humans, still raises concerns when discussing vaccination on a large scale.
The site, however, goes on to questioned this statement, pointing out that it misinterprets the EMA document. It claims the mRNA vaccine technology is “novel,” implying it’s experimental, giving credibility to anti-vaxxers. The paper states that while traditional vaccines like inactivated or live-attenuated vaccines aim to protect, mRNA vaccines are newer in that they “teach cells to produce a protein that triggers an immune response, helping the body to recognize and fight off a given virus.”
The article also references other sources, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United States’ John Hopkins Medicine, which have addressed the safety of mRNA COVID vaccines. These sources assure that the vaccines are safe, with small risks of serious side effects.clarify comparisons between their technologies. However, the true lies start in the links between “novel” and “experimental.” In fact, “novel” refers to the technology being revolutionary compared to traditional methods, such as inactivated or live attenuated vaccines.
Functions beyond scientific research have taken precedence. For instance, many reports, including those from烹iers, have linked mRNA vaccines to potential health risks. Simply putting万公里ally or doingxCovid疫苗食用xiangxiang，cervicalmukai（not related）are all bogus. Conflicts exist between different parties, such as anti-vaxxers who believe these mountains of vaccines pose a threat to human health, even though the EMA has repeatedly backed their claims and the Report contained authentic information.
The statement that governments and public health bodies accept mRNA COVID vaccines as safe is largely convinced by the scientific research and independent data provided by organizations like the EMA and WHO. Failing to sell these vaccines under their brand names is rare because they have been proven highly effective and safe through clinical trials. Many recipes online for “novel vaccines” actually use conventional methods and have nothing to do with mRNA technology, raising concerns about the ulterior motives of anti-vaxxers failing to protect the public.
In conclusion, this article intended to spread the harmful message that mRNA vaccines pose a threat to human health, but it was based on misinformation. The EMA and other scientific bodies have been clear that mRNA vaccines are safe and effective, and their use is not harmful.
